Farm safety First

Farming is one of the most dangerous industries in the world. 9.7 in every 100,000 workers employed on farms die each year. The next most dangerous industry is construction where the number of deaths is around 2.1 per 100,000 workers. Year after year the same accidents are occurring on farms but the industry isn’t learning or evolving.

I n 2005 I was involved in a life changing accident where I became entangled in a PTO shaft and lost my left arm. Since then I have used my story to help educate others in the industry. To try to bring together best practices in the field of accident prevention and discover why farmers are still having farm accidents in their pursuit of feeding the world.

Farmers don’t recognise risk to life in the same way other people do. As an industry they thrive on the risks associated with farming and relish the challenge of working in a dangerous environment. It must also be acknowledged that they have many pressures to deal with in farming, like time, finance and weather to name a few. As farmers they are very much multi-skilled. However, formal health and safety training isn’t one of the skills they possess, leading to a lack of understanding around the subject.

Safety initiatives need to be led by farmers for farmers. Safety also needs to be practical and easy to carry out: farmers don’t have time for complex paper-based systems as the workplace is extremely dynamic. Safe practices need to be embedded in the minds of everyone involved in the business to allow autonomous safe working.

A culture change, which will take time but will have a longer lasting effect on the industry, is needed. To enable a culture shift strong and effective leadership is essential for us, both from our farming leaders and in our own businesses. Farmers who can passionately promote safety should be identified to deliver peer-to-peer training on safe work procedures, and push clear and consistent messaging.

The use of independent auditors should be to help farmers identify risks on the farm to enable change. This could be done by farm assurance inspectors, insurance companies or even other farmers who can bring a fresh set of eyes to the workplace.

Agricultural colleges and universities must work on developing the next generation of safe farmers by integrating safety into every aspect of agricultural education to enable the long term goal of reducing accidents permanently.

Focusing my thoughts
Increasing regulation or penalties will not have a positive effect on farm safety. The disconnect between the regulator and the farmer will only increase if more regulation is enforced. The existing laws are adequate to keep workers safe; however, a lack of knowledge by farmers of existing regulation has rendered these laws ineffective. A mistrust of the regulator is also hindering a working relationship with farmers which could otherwise prove beneficial in reducing accidents.

Strong leadership is needed within the agricultural industry to enable greater progress with safety initiatives. When difficult decisions need to be made our farming leaders, for the greater good of the industry, need to put farm safety ahead of what might be popular with farming members.

Farmers sometimes find it difficult to recognise dangers on the farm, making it difficult to manage the problem. There is need to encourage more training in safe working procedures and then follow the training with continued development to keep farmers up to date with new techniques. This could be carried out in a class room type scenario, trade shows or even through web-based learning.

Agricultural education can and should help with creating a culture shift. We need to be creating a generation of safe farmers who will shape the future of agriculture. Social acceptance is a huge barrier to a shift in culture.They can start the shift at college and university but they must enable that culture to continue once the student arrives in the workplace. We must make safety “sexy”; many farmers don’t take safety seriously for fear of ridicule by their farming peers. A core of influential farmers needs to be empowered to create a “safety is cool” culture, and then the rest of the industry will follow, fearing exclusion by the new social group.

This group of “safe” farmers who are leading the way in safety will also be extremely good farmers, proving that safety won’t hinder farming, but enhance the business. Being a safe farm is also a good indicator that the business is professional and profitable. The “safe” farmers will also help mentor others and facilitate farm visits to help others visualise how safety works in a real life situation.

Safety needs to be practical; if it’s difficult then it won’t get done. As Dr Fogg describes, there are many barriers to change, some are perceived barriers but some are very real. We must keep it simple, low cost and with low physical effort. Farmers have already got a lot to think about day-to-day so any extra safe working practices need to be easily adopted with little cost.

Realizing Sustainable Land and Water Management in Farming Under Climate Change

By 2050, global food production must increase by 60%. Innovations for water management are essential in achieving this, Alan Nicol from IWMI highlighted. “For smallholder farming, managing agricultural water availability, access and use is key to success,” he noted. He shared case studies, including solar energy to strengthen access to water for agriculture, increasing availability via rainwater harvesting, improving usage via the wetting front technology, and understanding scale for food security monitoring and hazard risk mapping, as well as index-based flood insurance.

When it comes to water management, “it’s really about blending water-smart agricultural techniques and approaches; but also social and institutional environments in which they exist, into climate-smart agriculture,” he said. Theo de Jager, president of the the WFO gave the farmer perspective reiterating the importance of land and water for agriculture. He noted that unlocking the wealth in land and water required investments yet the world’s poorest farmers in the world cannot access financing.

De Jager called for better support and investments to ensure sustainable land and water use by farmers. “There are smart ways of using water and land because of new technologies - but they cost a lot of money,” he noted. Without access to finances, new technologies remain evasive for smallholder farmers. Yet with climate change, farmers cannot continue with the business as usual approach.“Many are caught up in a poverty trap; there’s no new technology, nothing has evolved. Irrigation, if there is any, is only flood irrigation,” he added. Smallholder farmer productivity is quite low and future farmers cannot continue the same way given scarce water and land resources. De Jager called for better support and investments to ensure sustainable land and water use by farmers.

In response to Theo’s call, James Kinyangi from the African Development Bank (AFDB) highlighted how the bank was building a supporting enabling environment in Africa for agricultural transformation. “We are working on seven enablers to support agricultural growth, productivity and value addition,” he noted. These include: increase productivity; value addition; hard and soft infrastructure; agricultural finance; agribusiness environment; inclusivity sustainability and nutrition; and coordination. Also, he highlighted work on risk management, asset protection and inclusion of women and youth as being crucial in providing a supporting enabling environment.

Kinyangi further highlighted various platforms and partnerships for mobilizing agricultural finance. These are: development finance institutions; AfDB country offices and local banks; co-development partners such as research institutions, policy and investor platforms; small and large scale agribusinesses, farmer organizations and food companies; investment funds; and donors, foundations and government organizations.

In his closing remarks, Dhanush Dinesh from CCAFS reflected on the question: Is sustainable land and water management compatible with small scale farming under climate change? “If we work on these factors appropriately, it is possible to be a yes,” he said. Such factors, as highlighted by various speakers included: having investments at different scales, in context and holistic models; leap frogging using data, science and research; social inclusion with a focus on women as well as youth who are farmers of the future, and building partnerships at scale very quickly.

Billionaires, from Poor Men’s Fields

It is only when the average African realizes that digging dirt is an honorable job, and develops the desire to be actively involved in it because of the financial liberation it comes with.

Asked where the next crop of African Billionaires will come from, the President of the African Development Bank, Nigerian Dr Akinwumi Adesina, without batting an eyelid, declared that they will be farmers. And he is not the only person in his class endorsing agriculture as the next frontier. Technology success Strive Masiyiwa, a Zimbabwean, has indicated more than once that if he was to start over, he would go into farming.

Africa’s richest man, Aliko Dangote, too, is now venturing into farming, just recently investing $4.6bn in Nigerian agriculture. Dangote plans to invest $3.8bn in sugar and rice and $800m in milk production in the next three years. Already greatly involved in agriculture, Dangote, through his Dangote Group conglomerate, is out to increase his sugar output by 50 per cent (from 100,000 tons), rice yield by 1 million tons, and start producing 500 million litres of milk a year by 2020.

Masiyiwa and Dangote are successful businessmen in their own right, and being billionaires, they must know something that the average African doesn’t.

Yet, for years, and even with front-seat access to data and consultant-advice from real billionaires, the majority of African governments have done little to reposition their economies as agricultural powerhouses. But things may now be set to change.

Read more ...

Sorghum boosts incomes, illicit liquor war

Economic empowerment is key in maintaining the mutually beneficial partnership, which has seen KBL pay more than Sh2 billion annually to local barley and sorghum famers. By Eric Kiniti.

Today, 80 per cent of raw materials used at Kenya Breweries Limited (KBL) is locally sourced—a milestone achieved through strategic partnerships in the value chain.

This has created employment for more than 30,000 farmers and continuously generates business value by supporting over 80,000 businesses.

A few years back, illicit liquor was one of the major challenges facing the country with thousands of youth opting for drinks such as chang’aa, which were cheap but often posed serious dangers to their health.

The drinks, contaminated with methanol and other concoctions, eventually caused blindness and resulted in death.

This led to the introduction of Senator Keg in the Kenyan market, which is now providing a safe, affordable beer that is at the centre of the fight against illegal brews.

The ongoing formalisation to enable licensing of outlets that previously sold illegal alcohol, making them exclusive Senator Keg outlets, will also ensure that consumers get high-quality beer in hygienic conditions and at affordable prices.

Alcohol manufacturers have a responsibility to create a responsible drinking culture.

Farmers, who are changing the community for the better, deserve to have a comfortable and decent life. Through the keg, KBL supports this concept by providing a market for drought-resistant crops such as sorghum, which is diversifying the country’s crop base and improving overall food security.

Economic empowerment is key in maintaining the mutually beneficial partnership, which has seen KBL pay more than Sh2 billion annually to local barley and sorghum farmers.

Our engagement with these smallscale farmers also focuses on the “Jilishe Kisha Uuze” programme that encourages them to grow sorghum and millet to meet their household needs then sell the surplus to increase their income.

Enhanced value partnerships with farmers to provide quality sorghum will ensure the production of Senator Keg continues and that consumers have a healthy and affordable option, pulling them away from the jaws of illicit brews.

Eric Kiniti is the corporate relations director at EABL. Growing.Value. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Uhuru’s land policy proposals may be a turning point in managing resources

There are no two ways here. Change is imperative and the President got it right in his policy proposals. He now needs our support.

By Bitange Ndemo

Kenya is among the unfortunate sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries that are likely to face a food crisis in the next five to 10 years unless some drastic policy interventions are made.

The government seems to be aware of this lurking danger. President Kenyatta, in his speech to the nation on his second inauguration, made some far-reaching policy proposals with respect to agriculture, land ownership and land use. The following is an extract from the President’s speech:

“We shall take steps to address idle arable land ownership and utilization. We shall take steps to encourage and facilitate large-scale commercial agriculture to help diversify our staples. We shall redesign subsidies to the sector to ensure they target improvements in food yields and production quality. We shall provide, together with other actors, key enablers within the farming process that will address distribution, wastage, storage and value-addition of agricultural commodities”. This may be the turning point to effectively managing the country’s resources, considering that in the past, planning has been an anathema.

Read more ...